Is there any fictional books which would be perfect for adaption? If so, then why?
I think with the popularity of biopics like "The Imitation Game," and "The Theory of Everything," I think an adaptation of "The Cryptonomicon" would do really well. – G Anderson Lake9 years ago
I think "Middlesex" by Jeffery Eugenides would be a great choice. Especially considering the upcoming adaptation of "The Danish Girl." Both stories deal with the transgender identity. – Cagney9 years ago
The Tamil epic "Ponniyin Selvan" is widely considered to be one of the most exciting stories every told, and this is the reason it has been left untouched for more than 60 years. It is just too perfect to be translated to any other medium. – Akilan9 years ago
I'd like to see an adaptation of Darren Shan's City trilogy. It has the prefect balance of mystery, fantasy, grittiness and intricate stories. The first two books run parallel to each other so it would be interesting to see this (although I think this would be better for a tv show). The variety of interesting characters (Paucar Wami, Al Jeery, the Cardinal) is just brilliant. – Jamie9 years ago
Due to the recent release of Mad Max: Fury Road and it's success, it seems relevant to discuss the fact the film is primarily fueled by practical effects. This article to could explore the importance of not utilizing CGI. Sadly, this is an larger tendency for film makers the past few decades.
Also, JJ Abrams has already demonstrated that he will be utilizing practical effects for the upcoming Star Wars film. – G Anderson Lake9 years ago
CGI pales in comparison with stunts done for real. There is that awe-factor which is leagues ahead of what we get from CGI. – Akilan9 years ago
A good film to watch or mention in your article would be Jurassic Park, I rewatched the film recently and they had a number of practical effects rather than CGI and I think it still holds up today. Mad Max: Fury Road has demonstrated that practical effects have a more visceral impact with viewers. The recent Evil Dead remake, while not a great film, incorporated practical effects to make the sickening gore more effective. – Nathan9 years ago
The famous diarrhea scene in Bridesmaids and the gratuitous vomiting in Pitch Perfect are an odd connection for the two biggest female driven comedies of the past ten years or possibly ever. Is toilet humor simply that funny or is it an attempt to appeal to the more stereotypically vulgar male crowd?
I don't think it is just female driven comedies that rely on toilet humor. I would say almost all comedies have toilet humor, as well as just gross-out humor. – Aaron Hatch9 years ago
I think in the past, toilet humor was more associated with men and male comedians (maybe it was considered "unladylike), but toilet humor can be funny no matter what your gender is. – S.A. Takacs9 years ago
In many films, the most recent being "Pitch Perfect 2," there are many obvious plugs for various companies (like the Beats headphones." For many, it is a turn; off because of how obvious the advertisement is (like it's a commercial instead of a film). It is understandable that the film needs financiers, but isn't there a way to make it less obvious?
What are some other films that have done this? Some films that have "good" product placements?
It would be interesting to find out the who, what and where on product placement. Perhaps, an example of the contractual agreement would be interesting to see who benefits the most. Also, what is the job title of the person who procures these placements. I have even noticed on HIMYM reruns that run in my area there are local advertisements Photoshoped into the show. For example, a calendar on the wall in Lilly and Marshals' apartment or table will have an add for a local restaurant here in town. I wondered who does this job and how the contracts work with these superimposed products in a syndicated show. – Venus Echos9 years ago
Despite Luke Skywalker being the main character in the trilogy, Solo is equally popular if not more so. Explore the dynamic of Han and why this builds upon his popularity.
Well that's because he has got more entertainment in him. He's unapologetic and fun. He's The Dude from the 70s - funky and very vocally, money-minded. No doubt people dig him. – Akilan9 years ago
He is the most dynamic of all the characters in the trilogy, which makes him more human and allows the audience to relate to him the most of all the characters. Luke and Leia are admirable, heroic characters from the start. Their resolve never falters and their honor is never doubted. Solo, on the other hand, goes through quite a transformation. He begins as a selfish man out for his own gain and ends up as a hero capable of teamwork, friendship and love. – Visenya9 years ago
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford.
Mad Max films are a brilliant example of non-verbal storytelling. Just look at any of the scenes from Road Warrior with no dialogue.
French movies are also known for their mis-en-scene and cinematography.
Kubrick and Hitchcock were masters. – Kristian Wilson9 years ago
If you are going to write about Mise-en-Scene you have to add Wes Anderson in there! You can also turn this into an interesting aspect of Auteur Theory in cinema. – CassDM9 years ago
With the release of the new Mad Max movie, this is a current topic.
A lot to choose from…
Paul Cox has made the most impressive films: Man of Flowers, A Woman's Tale, Innocence. He knows what goes on in people's souls.
Don's Party is very funny in places, but pretty cynical too; needs a strong stomach.
The Adventures of Barry Mackenzie is a riot. Hope to see it again sometime.
The Odd Angry Shot tells the story of Australian troops in Vietnam.
Holy Smoke is a lot of fun. Winslet and Keitel work well together.
Romper Stomper (1992)! Russell Crowe's first film! – CassDM9 years ago
I would suggest also discussing Bruce Beresford's "Breaker Morant." (1980) This article could also emphasize the work of women in Australian cinema, including Gillian Armstrong ("My Brilliant Career" (1979)) and Jane Campion ("The Piano" (1993)). For that matter an entire article could be devoted to the early work of Peter Weir, including discussion and analysis of "Picnic at Hanging Rock" (1975), "The Last Wave" (1977), "Gallipoli" (1981) and "The Year of Living Dangerously" (1982). – John Wilson9 years ago
Other than joking with the audience or having lack of creativity, are there any other reasons as to why the creators of Monty Python usually end their films with cliff hangers? For those who don't remember what they are, here is what I mean:
1.In "The Holy Grail", the film ends with a blatent TV freeze ending just as King Arthur and his knights of the round table were close to obtaining the holy grail.
2. In "Life of Brian", the film ends with an extreme long shot of Brian and all the other men who were crucified singing "Always look on the Bright Side of Life."
